Barthes’ Connotation Procedures 1: Trick Effects.
NB! There is a completely new version of this post at Phenomenology and Photography. Please visit. /140412
Again I am referring to a recent post for an overview of what Roland Barthes has to say about connotation procedures in his article The Photographic Message from 1961.
Let me also explain the rather technical syntax for the titles of these posts. Barthes used the name connotation procedures (in the English translation that is). Each have a additional title and a number. The first precedure he actually talks about is trick effects, or how you can change the overall meaning content of a photography by “tricking” your way around. In my post chronology this is post 4 (of 6).
1. Trick effects
Imagine that a certain politician fell out of grace. You could simply remove him from the photograph without anyone noticing and still present the photo as a historical fact. Or you could add a person or two, change the background from indoor to outdoor. There are many ways that you can go about such a intent.
Trick effects can be crude like in the instances mentioned, or they can be minor when you change the saturation of a colour, do a simple straightening of a horizon, or just add a bit of contrast to the final image.
Barthes does not mention these last option in his article, but I will add them here, since image manipulation of this sort have increased severely over the years. With photo editor software, this is a piece of cake nowadays. Even removing or adding a person is fairly easy.
Go to any photo site on the internet, you will find heavily manipulated stuff all over. In fact you will find much more manipulated stuff then straight photography. Nothing wrong in that, as long as you are aware of what is going on. It is not always there for you to see at first glance. You may not like this, since it blurs the borders between “reality” and “fiction”, but I am afraid that you have to live with it.
Bringing it down to basics; image manipulation might alter both the denotative and the connotative content of an image. Thus it is in Barthes’ term a connotation procedure.
In the picture you find below, you’ll see such a trick that Barthes is intending in his article. I have inserted the head of a woman into the lens this gentleman (whom I know well) looks through. Just for the fun of it
I am sure that the effect does not escape you. Is the red lady “a picture in his mind”, or is it “something he looks for or desire?” Or something quite different, maybe. I will leave you do decide. Under any circumstance this insert has altered the meaning content of this image, would you not say? It is an example of Barthes trick effects in photography as a way to manipulate communication content.
Copyright 2003: Knut Skjærven.
Library Thing. (Roland Barthes: Image, Music, Text, pages 15-31, Fontana Press 1977, UK. Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath).
Buy the English translation of Barthes’ work. Follow the link and support the site:
Image-Music-Text
April 8, 2008 - Posted by Knut Skjaerven | semiology, toolbox | Barthes' connotation procedures, connotation, connotations, denotation and connotation, photogenia, photography, Roland Barthes, semiology, trick effect
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About
Barebones Communication started in December 2007.
The idea was to make a blog about communication combining different resources like phenomenology, semiology, gestalt psychology, etcetera, and to show that different orientations worked well together.
I started adding a photograph to each post, and gradually the blog became oriented towards photography as an expression of visual communication.
In 2010 I made a blog solely based on photography. It became Berlin Black And White. Today is holds 470 images. The same month I started Phenomenology and Photography, as I found that was a particularly interesting area and one that there was scarcely any attention on.
I became interested in street photography and decided to develop that area in a living combination of photography and photographic theory. That is what I still do.
Barebones Communication became the mother blog for a series of specialized blogs as well as several social groups.
I call it THE BAREBONES PROJECT since everything is so closely linked to the inspiration you find in this blog. All of it has to do with phenomenology. Not in any scholarly fashion, but as the craft of photography. More specifically S T R E E T P H O T O G R A P H Y. I find that this type of spontaneous and documentary photography have a special kinship with phenomenology’s L I F E W O R L D.
I would like to think that I, as a photographer, E X E C U T E phenomenology. To me a mere scholarly interest in phenomenology can never be enough to fulfill the original intentions of phenomenology as, first and foremost, a practical, living philosophy. Phenomenology is not for reading. It is for D O I N G.
If you have an interest in how the theoretical platform are being developed into practical guidelines for street photography, you are welcome to follow the ongoing projects. I would be honoured if you did.
You will find all the activities listed in the link section of The Raw Material. I will keep it up to date.
Good luck with it.
Copenhagen, March 10, 2012.
Yes, I am impressed. Barebones Communication has largely been left unattended since mid 2010. It still runs incredibly well. The average views in 2111 were 68 a day, the same as in 2009. The most views on a single day were February 13, 2012 with 435 view.
Many thanks to all those who persistently use this blog. With this new introduction you have an opportunity to follow the many branches that has grown from it. Barebones Communication is still very much alive even if more goes on the sites that have sprung from it.
This year Barebones Communication with turn 100.000 visitors.
I really like your Venn representation of phenomenology
Hi
My name is Mary Edwards and I’m a doctoral student at the University of Florida studying educational technology. My cohort of doctoral students is creating resources pages using google groups and I’m designing a page about phenomenology and the phenomenological approach to research.
I really like your venn representation of phenomenology and request permission to add it to my page (image attached as a bitmap for your reference). Our google group site is limited to Ed Tech doc students and requires an administratively distributed password.
Thanks for your consideration.
Mary
Mary Edwards, MLIS
barebones’ Venn diagram
About The Blog
Barebones Basics
Barebones Cases
Barebones On Photography
Barebones Sites
Barthes' connotation procedures
Gestalt Factors
Henderson Britt Heritage
Hermeneutics
Kleingeld Phenomenology
Misc.
On Advertising
On Creativity
Phenomenology The Method
- 1.1 investigating particular phenomena (intuiting)
- 1.2 investigating particular phenomena (analyzing)
- 1.3 investigating particular phenomena (describing)
- 2. investigating general relationships
- 3. apprehending essential relationships
- 4. watching modes of appearing
- 5. exploring phenomena in consciousness
- 6. suspending belief in existence
- 7. interpreting concealed meanings
Szarkowski
THANKS FOR VISITING
- 119,809 visitors so far
Picturing The Communication Process
Top Posts
- Barthes on Studium and Punctum in Photography.
- Denotation and Connotation
- Is this "Quite Simply The Best Commercial Ever Made"?
- phenomenology: what is intentionality?
- Barthes' Connotation Procedures in Photography.
- TDC In The Nude
- The Pose
- Barthes’ Connotation Procedures 5: Aestheticism.
- from bare bones to bare breasts
- Barthes' Connotation Procedures 2: Pose.
-
Recent Posts
What a great find!
What a great find, I am a Communications student in Manchester UK, will pass you on.. Comment by okathleen | January 13, 2009.Archives
Search barebones
Recent Comments
JUANITO LOYOLA PERAN… on Phenomenological Method: 2. In… irene on Denotation and Connotatio… achergui on Lady in Red Knut Skjaerven on Barthes on Studium and Punctum… JP on Gestalt Factor: Similarit… Meta


