phenomenology: what is intentionality?
The central notion in phenomenology is “intentionality”.
Intentionality suggest that whenever there is consciousness, then consciousness is always consciousness of something. In other words, there is always something there for consciousness. Consciousness can not be empty.
This something can have different shapes and forms. Could be a physical, as well as a mental, object. Could be a logical, or could be emotional, object. There will always be something there for consciousness.
Take a look at the picture below: Consciousness is conscious of the picture, when you engage in it. Zoom in on the book in the background of the picture, and the book is that something for consciousness. Engage the person in the frame, or the pocket watch sharp in the foreground, then the frame, the person or the clock is that something for consciousness.
These are very simple examples, but there are much more to intentionality than this. Pick up the next posts, in this new barebones theme, and you will learn more about intentionality along the way. Just let me mention one important implication already in this post. I am sure you are aware of the dualism that Western thought have been locked up in for last several hundred years? The dualism saying that there basically are two worlds. the mental world, and the rest of it. But since the mental world is something going on inside people’s heads, the main question for many centuries has been: how does the human mind ever get outside a persons head to pick up objects of different kinds? (Ridiculous set-up, I know).
Phenomenology deals with this problem in an elegant way through intentionality. Since consciousness is always consciousness of something, the outer and the inner world are bound together from the very start. The question of how the mind get out into the world, should never have been posed. It is not a real issue. The mind, and the outer world are one coherent unit. They can’t be taken apart.
One more thing: Be clear that you understand “intentionality” right from the very start. You already know the word intention from everyday life. You intend something. You intend for, instance, to go to the movies tomorrow, to grab a bite to eat later, or you intend to go on holiday next summer. This “intentionality”, if you chose to call it that, is not the same as the intentionality used and intended in phenomenology.
In phenomenology you don’t have to be deliberate about your intent as you normally are in situations from everyday life. Intentionality understood within phenomenology is already there for you. You can’t avoid it.
So the pledge here is only this: don’t mix the two contents of intentionality.

My Grandfather's Clock. Copyright Knut Skjærven.
What’s in it?
What’s in it? Knowing about intentionality, what use could it have for communicators? If will try to state a few lines about that every time, that I post in this theme. But I will limit the scope of this tailing. I will bullet only 3 things, even if there are many more, that could be said. Easy for me, and good for you. So, here we go:
1. You need to know that consciousness is always consciousness of something. If you don’t know, you will not be able to act on it.
2. Even if you write a text, make a drawing, speak out load, take a photograph, but keep all of it in your drawer, these acts of communication will not, phenomenologically speaking, exist for others. The range of communication will be limited.
3. The character, and the content, of the potential response from people, with other minds that your own, will act and react on the message, or the none message, based on the totality of their former, present, and future intentionalities.
Pretty banal, I know, but it will be more precise as this theme unfolds.
February 1, 2009 - Posted by Knut Skjaerven | barebones communication, phenomenology, Resources | phenomenological method, phenomenological method in communication, phenomenology, what is phenomenology?
4 Comments »
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About
Barebones Communication started in December 2007.
The idea was to make a blog about communication combining different resources like phenomenology, semiology, gestalt psychology, etcetera, and to show that different orientations worked well together.
I started adding a photograph to each post, and gradually the blog became oriented towards photography as an expression of visual communication.
In 2010 I made a blog solely based on photography. It became Berlin Black And White. Today is holds 470 images. The same month I started Phenomenology and Photography, as I found that was a particularly interesting area and one that there was scarcely any attention on.
I became interested in street photography and decided to develop that area in a living combination of photography and photographic theory. That is what I still do.
Barebones Communication became the mother blog for a series of specialized blogs as well as several social groups.
I call it THE BAREBONES PROJECT since everything is so closely linked to the inspiration you find in this blog. All of it has to do with phenomenology. Not in any scholarly fashion, but as the craft of photography. More specifically S T R E E T P H O T O G R A P H Y. I find that this type of spontaneous and documentary photography have a special kinship with phenomenology’s L I F E W O R L D.
I would like to think that I, as a photographer, E X E C U T E phenomenology. To me a mere scholarly interest in phenomenology can never be enough to fulfill the original intentions of phenomenology as, first and foremost, a practical, living philosophy. Phenomenology is not for reading. It is for D O I N G.
If you have an interest in how the theoretical platform are being developed into practical guidelines for street photography, you are welcome to follow the ongoing projects. I would be honoured if you did.
You will find all the activities listed in the link section of The Raw Material. I will keep it up to date.
Good luck with it.
Copenhagen, March 10, 2012.
Yes, I am impressed. Barebones Communication has largely been left unattended since mid 2010. It still runs incredibly well. The average views in 2111 were 68 a day, the same as in 2009. The most views on a single day were February 13, 2012 with 435 view.
Many thanks to all those who persistently use this blog. With this new introduction you have an opportunity to follow the many branches that has grown from it. Barebones Communication is still very much alive even if more goes on the sites that have sprung from it.
This year Barebones Communication with turn 100.000 visitors.
I really like your Venn representation of phenomenology
Hi
My name is Mary Edwards and I’m a doctoral student at the University of Florida studying educational technology. My cohort of doctoral students is creating resources pages using google groups and I’m designing a page about phenomenology and the phenomenological approach to research.
I really like your venn representation of phenomenology and request permission to add it to my page (image attached as a bitmap for your reference). Our google group site is limited to Ed Tech doc students and requires an administratively distributed password.
Thanks for your consideration.
Mary
Mary Edwards, MLIS
barebones’ Venn diagram
About The Blog
Barebones Basics
Barebones Cases
Barebones On Photography
Barebones Sites
Barthes' connotation procedures
Gestalt Factors
Henderson Britt Heritage
Hermeneutics
Kleingeld Phenomenology
Misc.
On Advertising
On Creativity
Phenomenology The Method
- 1.1 investigating particular phenomena (intuiting)
- 1.2 investigating particular phenomena (analyzing)
- 1.3 investigating particular phenomena (describing)
- 2. investigating general relationships
- 3. apprehending essential relationships
- 4. watching modes of appearing
- 5. exploring phenomena in consciousness
- 6. suspending belief in existence
- 7. interpreting concealed meanings
Szarkowski
THANKS FOR VISITING
- 119,848 visitors so far
Picturing The Communication Process
Top Posts
-
Recent Posts
What a great find!
What a great find, I am a Communications student in Manchester UK, will pass you on.. Comment by okathleen | January 13, 2009.Archives
Search barebones
Recent Comments
JUANITO LOYOLA PERAN… on Phenomenological Method: 2. In… irene on Denotation and Connotatio… achergui on Lady in Red Knut Skjaerven on Barthes on Studium and Punctum… JP on Gestalt Factor: Similarit… Meta


…thanks for this! I focused on the photo as you asked & noticed the Sokolowski book on the desk, similar to how it is sitting on my desk. It was intended in its absence & its presence.
As an artist, the practice of phenomenology feels like what I’ve been doing all the time, but didn’t have a way of understanding. Now it is becoming a little clearer–
–aurelio
Dear Aurelio
Thanks for your comment and for your interest. Does that mean that you have the book by Sokolowski?
Please tell me more about your art. I am sincerely interested. Do you have a web page for your work?
The point is that phenomenology, in my opinion, is “exactly what you do all the time”. Reading about it will “only” give you a better understand of it, as you say.
Best
Knut
Hi Knut,
Nice to make a philosophical friend!! Yes, I’m reading through the Sokolowski Intro. right now! I love it. Meanwhile I want to look over your blog, to read more about your notes & ideas on the book. Any info. on the subject is not easy to find & to find a like mind is even better.
Perhaps if I have questions, I’ll think of you & we’ll continue a discourse.
All the best,
Aurelio
p.s. the is my artwork as featured on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28565738@N05/sets/
& my blog: luctor et emergo http://aureliomadrid.wordpress.com/
Dear Aurelio
Thanks one again. I found your sites already and I like what see there. I need to spend some more time with them. I’ll revert.
Yes, it is amazing that so few seems to be fascinated by phenomenology, even when it is quite down to earth most of it. The whole area have been obscured by cryptic language (Hussesl hilmself), and scholars who believe that philosophy, is best conducted by reading what others have written. And then repeat their words.
To me phenomenology is a search, a constant beginning and an eye for detail (well executed in your art e.g.)
This is hopefully reflected on barebones, where I try to puzzle my way around. So don’t look for answers, please, look for more questions
.
On the other hand, some of my photograph are pretty complete in the sense that they don’t need additional information to be “understood”. Though very ofter open ended, they are. Here is a link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bareboneslight/
Let me hear about your progress with Sokolowski, or even better about how you you execute “phenomenological thinking” in your art. That would be great
.
many thanks
Knut