Szarkowski Wrap Up.
Just a few words to wrap up the section on John Szarkowski.
Szarkowski is a former Director of Photography at New York’s Museum of Modern Art.
Apart from being a celebrated manager at MOMA he also was a keen photographer and scholar. He has written two books on photography: The Photographer’s Eye and Looking at Pictures. I happen to own a copy of each.
You get to look at pictures. One at the time. You get to better understand the visual language of photography. You get to read Szarkowski’s eye opening comments to many of the pictures.
I can only say this: Both books are great reads. Their content goes beyond photography, and Szarkowski’s keen sense of images and text makes them pure joy. They are books about communication.
You may start here:
Good luck with Szarkowski.
February 17, 2010 Posted by Knut Skjaerven | barebones communication | barebones communication | barebones communication | barebones, barebones photography, barebones pitstop, barebones puzzle, bareboneslight, Berlin, detail, detail in photography, John Szarkowski, Knut Skjaerven, Knut Skjærven, MOMA, Museum of Modern Art, on photography, photograph, photography, photography | barebones communication, pitstop puzzle, puzzle, The Photographers Eye, The Wall | Leave a Comment
Szarkowski: The Thing Itself.
“More convincingly than any other kind of picture, a photograph evokes the tangible presence of reality. Its most fundamental use and its broadest acceptance has been as a substitute for the subject itself – a simpler, more permanent, more clearly version of the plain fact.
Our faith in the truth of a photograph rests on our belief that the lens is impartial, and will draw the subject as it is, neither nobler nor meaner. This faith may be naive and illusory (for though the lens draws the subject, the photographer defines it), but is persists. The photographer’s vision convinces us to the degree that the photographer hides his hand.”
This is a barebones pitstop post. For more pitstop posts, please go to pitstop puzzle.
Other posts on Szarkowski: Introduction, The Thing Itself, The Detail, The Frame, Time, Vantage Point.
February 14, 2010 Posted by Knut Skjaerven | barebones communication | Alexanderplatz, barebones communication | barebones communication | barebones, barebones photography, barebones pitstop, barebones puzzle, bareboneslight, Berlin, detail, detail in photography, John Szarkowski, Knut Skjaerven, Knut Skjærven, MOMA, Museum of Modern Art, on photography, photograph, photography, photography | barebones communication, pitstop puzzle, puzzle, The Photographers Eye, The Wall, | barebones communication | barebones communication | Leave a Comment
Szarkowski: Vantage Point.
“If the photographer could not move his subject, he could move his camera. To see the subject clearly – often to see it at all – he had to abandon a normal vantage point, and shoot his picture from above, or below, or from too close, or too far away, or from the back side, inverting the order of things’ importance, or with the nominal subject of his picture half hidden.
From his photographs, he learned that the appearance of the world was richer and less simple than his mind would have guessed.
He discovered that his pictures could reveal not only the clarity but the obscurity of things, and the these mysterious and evasive images could also, in their own terms, seem ordered and meaningful”.
John Szarkowski: The Photographers Eye, The Museum of Modern Art, New York 2009.
This is a barebones pitstop post. For more pitstop posts, please go to pitstop puzzle.
Other posts on Szarkowski: Introduction, The Thing Itself, The Detail, The Frame, Time, Vantage Point.
February 13, 2010 Posted by Knut Skjaerven | barebones communication | barebones communication | barebones, barebones photography, barebones pitstop, barebones puzzle, bareboneslight, detail, detail in photography, John Szarkowski, Knut Skjaerven, Knut Skjærven, MOMA, Museum of Modern Art, on photography, photograph, photography, photography | barebones communication, pitstop puzzle, puzzle, The Photographers Eye, | barebones communication | barebones communication | 1 Comment
Szarkowski: The Detail.
“Once he left the studio, it was impossible for the photographer to copy the painters’ schemata. He could not stage-manage the battle, like Uccello or Velásquez, bringing together elements which had been separate in space and time, nor could he rearrange the parts of his picture to construct a design that pleased him better.
From the reality before him he could only choose that part that seemed relevant and consistent, and what would fill his plate. If he could not show the battle, explain its purpose and its strategy, or distinguish its heroes from its villains, he could show what was too ordinary to paint: the empty road scattered with cannon balls, the mud encrusted on the caisson’s wheels, the anonymous faces, the single broken figure by the wall.
Intuitively, he sought and found the significant detail. His work, incapable of narrative, turned toward symbol.”
John Szarkowski: The Photographers Eye, The Museum of Modern Art, New York 2009.
This is a barebones pitstop post. For more pitstop posts, please go to pitstop puzzle.
Other posts on Szarkowski: Introduction, The Thing Itself, The Detail, The Frame, Time, Vantage Point.
January 27, 2010 Posted by Knut Skjaerven | barebones communication | barebones communication, barebones communication | barebones, barebones photography, barebones pitstop, barebones puzzle, bareboneslight, detail, detail in photography, John Szarkowski, Knut Skjaerven, Knut Skjærven, MOMA, Museum of Modern Art, on photography, photograph, photography, photography | barebones communication, pitstop puzzle, puzzle, The Photographers Eye | Leave a Comment
About
Barebones Communication started in December 2007.
The idea was to make a blog about communication combining different resources like phenomenology, semiology, gestalt psychology, etcetera, and to show that different orientations worked well together.
I started adding a photograph to each post, and gradually the blog became oriented towards photography as an expression of visual communication.
In 2010 I made a blog solely based on photography. It became Berlin Black And White. Today is holds 470 images. The same month I started Phenomenology and Photography, as I found that was a particularly interesting area and one that there was scarcely any attention on.
I became interested in street photography and decided to develop that area in a living combination of photography and photographic theory. That is what I still do.
Barebones Communication became the mother blog for a series of specialized blogs as well as several social groups.
I call it THE BAREBONES PROJECT since everything is so closely linked to the inspiration you find in this blog. All of it has to do with phenomenology. Not in any scholarly fashion, but as the craft of photography. More specifically S T R E E T P H O T O G R A P H Y. I find that this type of spontaneous and documentary photography have a special kinship with phenomenology’s L I F E W O R L D.
I would like to think that I, as a photographer, E X E C U T E phenomenology. To me a mere scholarly interest in phenomenology can never be enough to fulfill the original intentions of phenomenology as, first and foremost, a practical, living philosophy. Phenomenology is not for reading. It is for D O I N G.
If you have an interest in how the theoretical platform are being developed into practical guidelines for street photography, you are welcome to follow the ongoing projects. I would be honoured if you did.
You will find all the activities listed in the link section of The Raw Material. I will keep it up to date.
Good luck with it.
Copenhagen, March 10, 2012.
Yes, I am impressed. Barebones Communication has largely been left unattended since mid 2010. It still runs incredibly well. The average views in 2111 were 68 a day, the same as in 2009. The most views on a single day were February 13, 2012 with 435 view.
Many thanks to all those who persistently use this blog. With this new introduction you have an opportunity to follow the many branches that has grown from it. Barebones Communication is still very much alive even if more goes on the sites that have sprung from it.
This year Barebones Communication with turn 100.000 visitors.
I really like your Venn representation of phenomenology
Hi
My name is Mary Edwards and I’m a doctoral student at the University of Florida studying educational technology. My cohort of doctoral students is creating resources pages using google groups and I’m designing a page about phenomenology and the phenomenological approach to research.
I really like your venn representation of phenomenology and request permission to add it to my page (image attached as a bitmap for your reference). Our google group site is limited to Ed Tech doc students and requires an administratively distributed password.
Thanks for your consideration.
Mary
Mary Edwards, MLIS
barebones’ Venn diagram
About The Blog
Barebones Basics
Barebones Cases
Barebones On Photography
Barebones Sites
Barthes' connotation procedures
Gestalt Factors
Henderson Britt Heritage
Hermeneutics
Kleingeld Phenomenology
Misc.
On Advertising
On Creativity
Phenomenology The Method
- 1.1 investigating particular phenomena (intuiting)
- 1.2 investigating particular phenomena (analyzing)
- 1.3 investigating particular phenomena (describing)
- 2. investigating general relationships
- 3. apprehending essential relationships
- 4. watching modes of appearing
- 5. exploring phenomena in consciousness
- 6. suspending belief in existence
- 7. interpreting concealed meanings
Szarkowski
THANKS FOR VISITING
- 119,752 visitors so far
Picturing The Communication Process
Top Posts
-
Recent Posts
What a great find!
What a great find, I am a Communications student in Manchester UK, will pass you on.. Comment by okathleen | January 13, 2009.Archives
Search barebones
Recent Comments
JUANITO LOYOLA PERAN… on Phenomenological Method: 2. In… irene on Denotation and Connotatio… achergui on Lady in Red Knut Skjaerven on Barthes on Studium and Punctum… JP on Gestalt Factor: Similarit… Meta





